Parliamentary Privilege (Defamation) Bill [HL]
Official Summary
A Bill to repeal section 13 of the Defamation Act 1996.
Summary powered by AnyModel
Overview
This bill, the Parliamentary Privilege (Defamation) Bill, seeks to repeal Section 13 of the Defamation Act 1996. This repeal aims to strengthen parliamentary privilege by removing a legal provision that restricts the ability of MPs and peers to sue for defamation regarding statements made in Parliament.
Description
The core purpose of this bill is the complete removal of Section 13 of the Defamation Act 1996. This section currently limits the ability of Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of the House of Lords to bring defamation cases related to statements made during parliamentary proceedings. By repealing Section 13, the bill intends to enhance the protection afforded to MPs and peers against defamation claims stemming from their parliamentary activities. This strengthens parliamentary privilege, which is the legal immunity enjoyed by parliamentarians in the performance of their duties. The bill is concise and directly addresses its objective. It will take effect immediately upon being passed and applies to the whole of the United Kingdom.
Government Spending
The bill is not expected to have a significant impact on government spending. The repeal of Section 13 is primarily a legislative change and does not involve direct financial implications for government departments or public funds.
Groups Affected
- Members of Parliament (MPs): The bill will strengthen their protection against defamation suits regarding statements made in Parliament.
- Members of the House of Lords (Peers): Similar to MPs, they will receive enhanced protection against defamation claims related to parliamentary proceedings.
- Individuals who may be subject to defamatory statements in Parliament: This group might face a greater risk of legal action from MPs and peers, as the existing limitations on such actions will be removed.
- The Courts: Increased litigation concerning parliamentary statements may result in an increased workload for the courts.
Powered by nyModel
DISCLAIMER: AI technology is not 100% accurate and summaries may contain errors, use at your own risk. Munro Research holds the copyright for all summaries found this website. Reproduction for non-commercial purposes is permitted but must be displayed alongside a link to this website. Contact info@munro-research to license commercially.