Overview

This bill amends the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015, primarily focusing on "temporary exclusion orders" (TEOs). It clarifies the process for imposing these orders, strengthens judicial oversight, and ensures legal aid is available for related proceedings. The bill also includes provisions affecting freedom of speech in universities and monitoring of performance in further and higher education institutions.

Description

Temporary Exclusion Orders (TEOs)

The bill significantly alters the process for issuing TEOs, which allow the Secretary of State to temporarily exclude individuals from the UK. It introduces a requirement for prior court permission unless the case is deemed urgent. The court's role is to determine if the Secretary of State's decisions are "obviously flawed." Individuals subject to TEOs are given the right to judicial review of the relevant decisions, with the court applying judicial review principles. New schedules detail court procedures, including provisions for anonymity and the appointment of special advocates to protect sensitive information.

Legal Aid

Amendments ensure legal aid is available for individuals involved in legal proceedings related to TEOs, expanding access to justice for those affected.

Freedom of Speech in Universities

The bill adds a new clause emphasizing the importance of freedom of speech and academic freedom in universities and other educational institutions when considering actions under the Act.

Monitoring of Further and Higher Education Institutions

New clauses introduce a monitoring system for further and higher education bodies to ensure compliance with the duty to ensure freedom of speech. This involves reporting requirements and the power for the Secretary of State to issue directions to ensure compliance.

Reviews of Terrorism Legislation

The bill mandates regular reviews of the operation of various counter-terrorism Acts, including Part 1 of this Act, to ensure their effectiveness and appropriateness.

Government Spending

The bill's financial implications are not explicitly stated in the provided text. However, there will likely be costs associated with legal aid provision for TEO-related proceedings, the operation of the monitoring system for educational institutions, and the independent reviews of terrorism legislation.

Groups Affected

• Individuals subject to TEOs: They will experience altered procedural rights, including increased judicial oversight and access to legal aid.
• The Secretary of State: Their powers regarding TEOs are modified to include increased judicial scrutiny.
• The Courts: Their role is expanded to include pre-emptive and post-decision review of TEOs.
• Legal professionals: Increased workload due to expanded legal aid provisions and new court procedures.
• Universities and other educational institutions: They will need to comply with the reinforced emphasis on freedom of speech and academic freedom.
• The Independent Reviewer: Expanded responsibilities in reviewing counter-terrorism legislation.

Powered by nyModel