Parliamentary.ai


by Munro Research

Conscientious Objection (Medical Activities) Bill [HL]


Official Summary

A Bill to clarify the extent to which a medical practitioner with a conscientious objection may refrain from participating in certain medical activities; and for connected purposes.

Summary powered by AnyModel

Overview

This bill clarifies the rights of medical practitioners in England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland to refuse to participate in certain medical procedures based on conscientious objection. It aims to protect healthcare professionals from discrimination while ensuring patient access to legal medical services.

Description

This bill protects medical practitioners with conscientious objections from being compelled to participate in:

  • Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment;
  • Activities under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (e.g., IVF procedures);
  • Activities under the Abortion Act 1967 (including all stages of the abortion process).

The definition of "medical practitioner" includes doctors, nurses, and other healthcare professionals registered with relevant councils. "Participating in" encompasses supervision, delegation, planning, or support of staff involved in the objected activity. The bill explicitly prevents employers from discriminating against or victimizing employees who exercise this right. The burden of proof for claiming conscientious objection rests on the individual. Crucially, this bill does not reduce existing protections under the Abortion Act 1967 and the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.

Government Spending

The bill's impact on government spending is not specified in the provided text. There is no mention of any direct funding allocations or budgetary changes.

Groups Affected

  • Medical Practitioners: Those with conscientious objections to specific procedures gain legal protection against discrimination and coercion.
  • Employers (Healthcare Providers): They have a legal obligation not to discriminate against employees exercising their right to conscientious objection.
  • Patients: While the bill protects healthcare professionals' rights, it doesn't directly address the potential impact on patient access to services. Ensuring continued access to legal medical procedures remains a separate consideration.
Full Text

Powered by nyModel

DISCLAIMER: AI technology is not 100% accurate and summaries may contain errors, use at your own risk. Munro Research holds the copyright for all summaries found this website. Reproduction for non-commercial purposes is permitted but must be displayed alongside a link to this website. Contact info@munro-research to license commercially.