Conscientious Objection (Medical Activities) Bill [HL]
Official Summary
A Bill to clarify the extent to which a medical practitioner with a conscientious objection may refrain from participating in certain medical activities; and for connected purposes
Summary powered by AnyModel
Overview
This bill clarifies the rights of medical practitioners in England and Wales to refuse to participate in certain medical procedures based on conscientious objection. It aims to strengthen existing protections and ensure that those with such objections are not discriminated against.
Description
The Conscientious Objection (Medical Activities) Bill protects medical practitioners from being compelled to participate in:
- Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment;
- Activities under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (e.g., IVF);
- Activities under the Abortion Act 1967 (including all aspects of abortion procedures).
The bill defines "medical practitioner" broadly to include doctors, nurses, midwives, and pharmacists. "Participating" encompasses supervision, delegation, planning, or supporting staff involved in these activities. The bill prohibits employers from discriminating against employees who exercise this right, covering terms of employment, promotion, training, and other benefits. It places the burden of proof of conscientious objection on the individual, but a sworn statement is sufficient evidence. Existing conscientious objection provisions within the Abortion Act 1967 and the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 are not diminished by this bill.
Government Spending
The bill is not expected to have a significant direct impact on government spending. The potential indirect costs are difficult to quantify, and may involve legal challenges and potential adjustments to service provision, but no figures are available.
Groups Affected
- Medical Practitioners: Those with conscientious objections to the specified medical activities gain strengthened legal protection against compelled participation and discrimination.
- Employers (Healthcare providers): May face challenges in staffing and service provision if many employees invoke conscientious objection. They are also legally obligated to not discriminate against employees exercising these rights.
- Patients: Access to certain medical procedures might be affected if a sufficient number of practitioners refuse participation on grounds of conscientious objection. This could result in longer waiting times or difficulty accessing services in some areas.
Powered by nyModel
DISCLAIMER: AI technology is not 100% accurate and summaries may contain errors, use at your own risk. Munro Research holds the copyright for all summaries found this website. Reproduction for non-commercial purposes is permitted but must be displayed alongside a link to this website. Contact info@munro-research to license commercially.