Parliamentary.ai


by Munro Research

Local Health Scrutiny Bill


Official Summary

A Bill to make provision about health scrutiny by local authorities, including scrutiny of clinical commissioning groups' decisions; and for connected purposes.

Summary powered by AnyModel

Overview

The Local Health Scrutiny Bill aims to strengthen the ability of local authorities in England and Wales to scrutinize decisions made by clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) regarding healthcare proposals. The bill enhances local authorities' powers to request information and challenge decisions, improving transparency and accountability within the healthcare system.

Description

This bill amends the Local Authority (Public Health, Health and Wellbeing Boards and Health Scrutiny) Regulations 2013. Key changes include:

  • Enhanced Information Gathering: Local authorities gain the power to demand information from CCGs to fully understand the decision-making process behind healthcare proposals, including alternative options considered and the potential impact on patients and staff.
  • Reasoned Responses: CCGs are required to provide detailed reasons for disagreeing with recommendations made by local authorities.
  • Delaying Implementation: CCGs cannot implement proposals that are subject to a local authority report to the Secretary of State until the Secretary of State has responded.
  • Secretary of State's Response Timelines: The Secretary of State must respond to reports from local authorities within 45 days, outlining decisions made and the reasons for those decisions.

Government Spending

The bill is not expected to significantly impact government spending. The main cost will be related to the increased administrative burden on CCGs in providing information and responding to local authority requests, and the time spent by the Secretary of State in reviewing reports. No specific figures have been provided.

Groups Affected

  • Local Authorities: Gain increased powers to scrutinize healthcare decisions, leading to greater influence over local health services.
  • Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs): Face increased scrutiny and administrative burden in providing information and justifying their decisions.
  • Patients and Staff: May benefit from increased transparency and accountability in healthcare decision-making, potentially leading to improved services.
  • Secretary of State for Health: Takes on a more active role in resolving disputes between local authorities and CCGs.
Full Text

Powered by nyModel

DISCLAIMER: AI technology is not 100% accurate and summaries may contain errors, use at your own risk. Munro Research holds the copyright for all summaries found this website. Reproduction for non-commercial purposes is permitted but must be displayed alongside a link to this website. Contact info@munro-research to license commercially.