Parliamentary.ai


by Munro Research

Duty to Plan for Terrorism (Consultation) Bill [HL]


Official Summary

A Bill to provide for consultation on the introduction of a Duty to Plan to require Category 1 responders to plan for terrorist threats and require those responsible for places to which the public have access to consider the vulnerability of those places to attack and take measures to mitigate any such vulnerability; and for connected purposes.

Summary powered by AnyModel

Overview

This bill mandates a consultation on implementing a "Duty to Plan" for terrorism. This would require key responders (like emergency services) and those responsible for public places to plan for and mitigate terrorist threats.

Description

The bill compels the Secretary of State to consult various groups (detailed below) on four key areas:

  • The feasibility and desirability of obligating Category 1 responders (defined by the Civil Contingencies Act 2004) to plan for terrorism.
  • The feasibility and desirability of requiring those responsible for public spaces to receive training on counter-terrorism.
  • The feasibility and desirability of mandating vulnerability assessments of public places against terrorist attacks.
  • The feasibility and desirability of requiring mitigation and counter-terrorism plans for identified vulnerabilities in public spaces.

The consultation must conclude within six months of the bill passing, with a report detailing plans for future legislation presented to Parliament.

Government Spending

The bill itself doesn't directly allocate funds. However, implementing any future legislation arising from this consultation would likely involve government expenditure on consultation processes, potential new training programs, and support for organizations in developing and implementing security measures.

Groups Affected

  • Category 1 Responders: (e.g., emergency services, local authorities) – Potentially increased responsibilities and resource allocation for terrorism planning.
  • Businesses & Venue Owners: (e.g., entertainment venues, sporting venues, businesses open to the public, places of education, places of worship) – Potentially increased costs associated with security assessments, training, and mitigation plans.
  • Licensing & Regulatory Bodies: – May need to adapt their processes to reflect any new requirements.
  • Victims of Terrorism: – Their views and experiences will be considered in the consultation process.
Full Text

Powered by nyModel

DISCLAIMER: AI technology is not 100% accurate and summaries may contain errors, use at your own risk. Munro Research holds the copyright for all summaries found this website. Reproduction for non-commercial purposes is permitted but must be displayed alongside a link to this website. Contact info@munro-research to license commercially.