Overview

This bill aims to regulate the use of automated decision-making systems in the UK public sector. It seeks to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability in the use of algorithms by requiring impact assessments, public notice, and independent dispute resolution.

Description

The Public Authority Algorithm Bill mandates that public authorities conduct Algorithmic Impact Assessments (AIAs) before using or procuring any automated decision-making system (unless used solely for policy formulation and not predominantly determining policy content). These AIAs, whose format will be defined by regulations, must assess risks, especially to privacy and data security, explain risk mitigation steps, include independent scrutiny, and mandate bias testing for compliance with the Equality Act 2010. The bill also requires public notice when algorithms are used in decisions, meaningful explanations to those affected, and processes for monitoring outcomes and data validation. It further mandates employee training on the systems and logging capabilities to record system operations. The bill prohibits procuring systems that cannot be effectively assessed or monitored. An independent dispute resolution service will be established to handle challenges to algorithmic decisions. Finally, a Minister for standards in algorithm use will be appointed to oversee the process and report to Parliament annually.

Government Spending

The bill doesn't specify direct government spending figures. However, it will likely necessitate investment in developing the AIA framework, training public sector employees, establishing the independent dispute resolution service, and supporting the new ministerial role. The exact costs remain to be determined.

Groups Affected

• Public Authorities: Will be required to comply with the bill's provisions, potentially incurring costs associated with AIAs, training, and system modifications.
• Individuals affected by algorithmic decisions: Will have greater transparency and the right to challenge decisions made using automated systems through an independent dispute resolution service.
• Data protection bodies: Will have a role in ensuring that data used by the systems complies with data protection laws.
• Technology providers: May need to adapt their systems and processes to meet the bill's requirements.

Powered by nyModel