Overview

The Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Act 2008 established a legal framework for granting anonymity to witnesses in criminal proceedings in the UK. It replaced the common law approach, providing clear conditions under which witness anonymity orders could be made to protect witnesses and ensure fair trials.

Description

Witness Anonymity Orders

The Act defines a "witness anonymity order" as a court order specifying measures to protect a witness's identity. These measures can include withholding the witness's name and other identifying details, using a pseudonym, restricting questioning, screening the witness, or modulating their voice. The court cannot, however, screen or modulate a witness to the point that they cannot be seen or heard by the judge, jury, or court-appointed personnel.

Applications for Orders

Applications for anonymity orders can be made by either the prosecutor or the defendant. The prosecutor must inform the court of the witness's identity but doesn't need to disclose this information to other parties. Similar rules apply to defendants. The court must give all parties a chance to be heard before making a decision, but may do so without a specific defendant if deemed appropriate.

Conditions for Making an Order

A witness anonymity order can only be made if three conditions are met: (A) the specified measures are necessary to protect the witness's safety, another person's safety, prevent serious property damage, or prevent real harm to the public interest; (B) the measures are consistent with the defendant receiving a fair trial; and (C) the order is necessary in the interests of justice because the witness would not testify otherwise.

Relevant Considerations

When deciding whether these conditions are met, the court must consider the defendant's right to know the witness's identity, the witness's credibility, whether the witness's evidence is crucial, the testability of the evidence without disclosure, the witness's potential dishonesty, and whether alternative protection methods are feasible.

Discharge or Variation of Orders

The court can discharge or vary an anonymity order if appropriate, based on changes of circumstances since the order was made, either upon an application by a party or on its own initiative.

Warnings to the Jury

If a witness anonymity order was in effect during a jury trial, the judge must warn the jury to prevent the order from prejudicing the defendant. Similar provisions apply to service courts (military courts).

Government Spending

The Act doesn't directly specify government spending figures. The cost implications relate to increased judicial workload, potential support for witnesses in need of protection, and potential legal costs for both prosecution and defense. No specific budget was allocated, the costs are absorbed within existing budgets of the justice system.

Groups Affected

• Witnesses: May benefit from increased protection, leading to greater willingness to testify in cases where they face threats.
• Defendants: May face challenges to their right to a fair trial if anonymity orders restrict their ability to challenge witness testimony.
• Prosecutors: Have a role in applying for anonymity orders and must balance witness protection with the requirements of a fair trial.
• Judges and Juries: Need to carefully consider the implications of anonymity orders when weighing evidence and ensuring fair trials.
• The Public: Increased transparency and potential for justice in some cases could be balanced against the risk of obstructing the apprehension and prosecution of criminals if the anonymity provisions are abused

Powered by nyModel