Coroners and Justice
Official Summary
A Bill to amend the law relating to coroners and to certification and registration of deaths; to amend the criminal law; to make provision about criminal justice and about dealing with offenders; to make provision about the Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses; to make provision relating to the security of court and other buildings; to make provision about legal aid; to make provision for payments to be made by offenders in respect of benefits derived from the exploitation of material pertaining to offences; to amend the Data Protection Act 1998; and for connected purposes.
Summary powered by AnyModel
Overview
This bill, primarily concerning inquests and the release of intercepted communications data, involves disagreements between the House of Lords and the House of Commons regarding access to information during inquests and the necessity of a specific provision within the Public Order Act 1986.
Description
The bill centers around several key amendments. The Lords proposed amendments to allow coroners access to intercepted communications data (relevant to inquests), subject to restrictions on public disclosure. The Commons rejected these amendments citing concerns about public disclosure of sensitive information. A compromise was reached, with the Lords offering an alternative amendment (1B) that allows a senior coroner to suspend an inquest if an inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005 is underway. Separately, the Lords sought to remove sections (Clause 61 and parts of Clause 165) of the Public Order Act 1986, deeming them unnecessary. The Commons disagreed, insisting on the necessity of these provisions.
Key Amendments
- Amendment 1B: Allows inquest suspension if a related inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005 is active.
- Amendments 59, 119, 121, 236, 239: Concern the removal of sections within the Public Order Act 1986. The Lords insisted on their removal, while the Commons opposed it.
Government Spending
The bill's impact on government spending is not explicitly stated in the provided text. Any financial implications would likely stem from the potential need for additional resources to support inquiries under the Inquiries Act 2005 should inquests be suspended.
Groups Affected
- Coroners: Affected by the process of conducting inquests, potentially including suspension of investigations.
- Individuals involved in inquests: Access to evidence may be affected depending on the outcome regarding intercepted communications data.
- Law enforcement agencies: Concerned with the potential for public disclosure of intercepted material.
- The judiciary: Involved in overseeing and potentially appointing judges to inquiries under the Inquiries Act 2005.
Powered by nyModel
DISCLAIMER: AI technology is not 100% accurate and summaries may contain errors, use at your own risk. Munro Research holds the copyright for all summaries found this website. Reproduction for non-commercial purposes is permitted but must be displayed alongside a link to this website. Contact info@munro-research to license commercially.